Market Failure and Government Intervention :: Papers

Market Failure and Government discourseThis essay will stress the purpose of market failure and the measures that governments take remedy the failure of the market.The concept of perfect market storage allocation of resources was in W. Baumols (1988,631), view largly theroretical. Baumol believed that economic models relied upon the concept of the covert hand first discussed by Adam Smith. In these models, the perfectly competetive preservation was able to allocate resources efficiently, without the need for market intervention by outside agents, including governments. However, there were significant weaknesses in these models particuarly in the atomic number 18a of ensuring equity of acess, friendly objectives and in the provision of public goods.Ensuring equity of acess, meeting social objectives and providing public goods.were considered the main reasons why the public sector provided goods. Why governments intervened in the market was due in the main to charact oristics of the market place. If the market place was to function efficiently, several conditions needed to exsist, including,*Freedom of pickaxe*Certainty of demand *Miniminal externalities*ExcludabilityIn addition to these prerequisites, the perfect market essential perfect consumer and supplier information, no rent seeking behaviour and no moralistic hazard existed. If these conditions were not met, market mechanisms would fail to produce the efficient allocation of resources. P. Groenewegen (1990,2) argued that governments intervened in the market place with the,... Public sector... being engaged in the providing sevices (and in some cases goods) whose scope and variety are determined not by the direct wishes of the consumers, but by the the decisions of government bodies.This view implies that governments intervene for many reasons, including the redistributional and stablisation functions. tour market failure is one reason for intervention, other consideratio ns, including questions of equity and social justice determined the nature and the extent of government intervention. This point was expanded upon by Groenewegen (1990,2) who argued that the extent of market intervention in the supply, distribution and redistibution of goods and services are not dictated by purly political and ideological considerations, other considerations may escape a role including the failure of the market in certain instances to come across efficient, equiable allocation of resources.Another reason why governments intervened in the market place was to crack the provision of public goods. Public goods are generally comodities that are socially desiralbe but cannot be financed through the private sector.Market Failure and Government Intervention PapersMarket Failure and Government InterventionThis essay will examine the concept of market failure and the measures that governments take remedy the failure of the market.The concept of perfect market alloc ation of resources was in W. Baumols (1988,631), view largly theroretical. Baumol believed that economic models relied upon the concept of the invisible hand first discussed by Adam Smith. In these models, the perfectly competetive economy was able to allocate resources efficiently, without the need for market intervention by outside agents, including governments. However, there were significant weaknesses in these models particuarly in the area of ensuring equity of acess, social objectives and in the provision of public goods.Ensuring equity of acess, meeting social objectives and providing public goods.were considered the main reasons why the public sector provided goods. Why governments intervened in the market was due mainly to charactoristics of the market place. If the market place was to function efficiently, several conditions needed to exsist, including,*Freedom of choice*Certainty of demand *Miniminal externalities*ExcludabilityIn addition to these prerequisi tes, the perfect market required perfect consumer and supplier information, no rent seeking behaviour and no moral hazard existed. If these conditions were not met, market mechanisms would fail to produce the efficient allocation of resources. P. Groenewegen (1990,2) argued that governments intervened in the market place with the,... Public sector... being engaged in the providing sevices (and in some cases goods) whose scope and variety are determined not by the direct wishes of the consumers, but by the the decisions of government bodies.This view implies that governments intervene for many reasons, including the redistributional and stablisation functions. While market failure is one reason for intervention, other considerations, including questions of equity and social justice determined the nature and the extent of government intervention. This point was expanded upon by Groenewegen (1990,2) who argued that the extent of market intervention in the supply, distribut ion and redistibution of goods and services are not dictated by purly political and ideological considerations, other considerations may play a role including the failure of the market in certain instances to ensure efficient, equiable allocation of resources.Another reason why governments intervened in the market place was to ensure the provision of public goods. Public goods are generally comodities that are socially desiralbe but cannot be financed through the private sector.